Taro (mother2012) wrote,
Taro
mother2012

So let me see if I have this straight.

1 Ponderosa was suspended because someone complained about a manip or drawing she posted.

2 Her entire journal was suspended and she was banned from LJ because the pic was pornographic.

3 It wasn't homosexuality that made it pornographic.

4 It wasn't underage sex that made it pornographic.

5 It was suspended because it lacked artistic merit in addition to depicting underage homosexuality.

6 It wasn't suspended because it lacked artistic merit.

7 2. Should any Content that you have authored be reported to LiveJournal as being offensive or inappropriate, LiveJournal might call upon you to retract, modify, or protect (by means of private and friends only settings) the Content in question within a reasonable amount of time, as determined by the LiveJournal staff.

However:
8 It is necessary to immediately delete an entire journal due to one complaint because LJ can't be certain when some legal entitiy will come in and shut them down.

9 It is not possible to notify the LJ owner and request that the one entry be removed.

10 It is not possible for LJ to remove the offending entry.

11 It is absolutely necessary to remove the customer, thereby offending the entire fandom.

12 There is no appeal.

13 The suspended customer can appeal, but since it won't do any good, LJ does not disseminate this information.

14 LJ will never again take so long responding to the concerns of 40,000 of its customers.

15 Until next time.

If I've missed something, please tell me.

ETA: I think I've got it! Explicit underage homoeratic art (whether or not it has artistic merit) is okay if it's anime!
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 28 comments